Wes Streeting condemns far-right hate speech and calls for unity and respect

UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting has fiercely criticised the rise of racist and homophobic rhetoric under the guise of free speech, emphasising the importance of unity, respect, and safeguarding minority communities amid growing societal divisions.

Wes Streeting, the UK Health Secretary, has delivered a robust condemnation of the rising tide of racism and homophobia that has been cloaked under the guise of free speech. Speaking at an LGBT Foundation event, Streeting labelled the suggestion that increasing racial and homophobic abuse represents free speech as “laughable,” framing it as a dangerous misappropriation of a fundamental right. His comments came in the wake of far-right protests in London, which he described as “not the kind of country any of us want to live in.”

Streeting highlighted the growing fears experienced by Black and Asian communities, describing an “increasingly visible tide of racism” that hides behind national symbols such as the Union Jack. He cited disturbing incidents including racial slurs hurled on London’s streets and physical attacks like the ripping of hijabs. In addition, he pointed out that trans people currently feel less safe than they did a decade ago, stressing that the government cannot ignore these realities. The Health Secretary also acknowledged the tensions surrounding gender and trans rights and called for respectful debate to avoid societal division being exploited by polarising forces.

These remarks underscore a growing concern among some Labour MPs and activists that the government’s response to far-right organising and hate-driven demonstrations has lacked urgency. Over the weekend, a nationalist rally in London led by far-right figure Tommy Robinson triggered fears of rising extremism and prompted Prime Minister Keir Starmer to reiterate a firm stance, declaring the UK would “never surrender” its flag to racism or violence. Starmer condemned the intimidation of minorities, affirming the nation’s commitment to diversity and tolerance.

Streeting’s speech also touched on the controversies within the NHS and the wider public sphere concerning trans rights. He pointed out how an LGBT healthcare workers’ conference has become an arena of dispute, reflecting broader cultural tensions. A decade ago, such events passed without controversy; today, opposition to equality, diversity, and inclusion initiatives is vocal and widespread. He emphasised that health inequalities are not minor issues but matters of life and death, reinforcing the importance of fighting hatred on the streets through collective action.

Further highlighting his nuanced position, Streeting addressed concerns from the trans community, many of whom felt alienated after his early decision as health secretary to pause the prescription of puberty blockers for young people. He explained that his motivation was grounded in ensuring that any medical treatments are evidence-based and safe. Additionally, he recognised the complex balancing act required to reconcile trans rights with sex-based rights of women, seeking a path forward that guarantees equality, dignity, and safety for all.

Streeting’s comments are notable not only for their content but also because of his political significance within Labour. He is widely regarded as a potential successor to Keir Starmer, though party insiders note he would need to build bridges with the left-wing faction of Labour to consolidate support. Despite challenges facing the party leadership, Streeting has remained consistently loyal to Starmer, whose tenure has been marked by declining popularity and internal resignations.

Historically, Streeting has been a prominent advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, having previously served as head of education at Stonewall where he led efforts to tackle homophobia in schools. He has publicly acknowledged in past interviews that he should have more openly supported women concerned about trans issues, emphasising the need for balanced discourse around these often divisive topics. His record reflects an ongoing commitment to equality and inclusion while navigating the complexities of contemporary social debates.

The backdrop to Streeting’s statements is a UK grappling with the rise of populist right-wing movements, which have promoted a ‘miserablist, declinist’ vision of the country, according to his Fabian Society speech earlier this year. Climate protests at that event underscored the broader social and political unrest prevalent in the UK today. Streeting’s strong rebuke of hate-driven movements, coupled with his calls for reasoned debate and inclusivity, positions him as a figure seeking to unify amidst growing societal divisions.

In sum, Wes Streeting’s intervention provides a stark reminder of the challenges facing Britain as it confronts the resurgence of far-right hatred and the contentious discourse surrounding minority rights. His emphasis on rejecting hate under the pretext of free speech, protecting vulnerable communities, and fostering respectful dialogue offers a clear vision for a more tolerant and cohesive society. As political and social tensions mount, his stance signals Labour’s need to reaffirm its commitment to defending diversity and equality at this critical moment.

📌 Reference Map:

• Paragraph 1 – ^[1], ^[2], ^[4]
• Paragraph 2 – ^[1], ^[2], ^[3]
• Paragraph 3 – ^[1]
• Paragraph 4 – ^[1], ^[3]
• Paragraph 5 – ^[1]
• Paragraph 6 – ^[1], ^[5]
• Paragraph 7 – ^[1], ^[7], ^[5]
• Paragraph 8 – ^[4], ^[1]
• Paragraph 9 – ^[1], ^[2]

Source: Noah Wire Services

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
10

Notes:
The narrative is fresh, with no evidence of prior publication. The earliest known publication date is 16 September 2025. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were found. The narrative is not based on a press release, indicating a high freshness score.

Quotes check

Score:
10

Notes:
The direct quotes used in the narrative do not appear in earlier material, suggesting originality. No identical quotes were found in prior publications.

Source reliability

Score:
10

Notes:
The narrative originates from The Guardian, a reputable organisation, enhancing its reliability.

Plausability check

Score:
10

Notes:
The claims made in the narrative are plausible and align with known events. The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic. The narrative lacks excessive or off-topic detail, and the tone is appropriate for the subject matter.

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH

Summary:
The narrative is fresh, original, and originates from a reputable source. The claims are plausible, and the language and tone are appropriate. No significant credibility risks were identified.