Foreign firms are able to take minority stakes in British newspapers after MPs voted by a wide margin to relax restrictions on overseas ownership. The House of Commons approved a government-backed amendment allowing companies based outside the UK to own up to 15% of newspaper businesses, a move framed by ministers as a way to protect press sustainability while guarding against undue foreign influence.
The vote – 338 in favour to 79 against – paves the way for the long-delayed sale of the Telegraph Media Group. RedBird IMI, a joint venture between US-based RedBird Capital and Abu Dhabi’s state-linked International Media Investments (IMI), is now expected to move ahead with plans to take a minority stake in the Telegraph under the new rules. The £500 million deal, first struck in May, had been stalled by regulatory and political concerns under the previous Conservative government, particularly over IMI’s involvement.
The Telegraph has been at the centre of a two-year standoff over foreign ownership. The Barclay family, which owned the title, sought to sell to clear debts, but the government blocked the transaction to RedBird IMI citing national security and editorial independence risks. Ministers have now opted for a compromise: allowing limited foreign investment while banning majority stakes by state-linked entities.
Labour culture minister Stephanie Peacock defended the move in parliament, saying it aimed to “create certainty and sustainability for our newspaper industry while mitigating risks of foreign state influence.” But critics remain wary. Former Conservative leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith and the Liberal Democrats both raised concerns about the potential for editorial compromise, even under a 15% cap. The Lib Dems had campaigned for a full ban on foreign state ownership.
Other potential investors in the Telegraph include Sir Len Blavatnik, one of the UK’s richest men, who has reportedly shown interest in taking a stake alongside RedBird IMI. The Daily Mail is also said to be exploring investment options.
The new law forms part of a broader overhaul of media ownership and merger rules, which are being updated to reflect the digital age. The government has signalled that online news providers will be brought under similar oversight in future, with an emphasis on protecting editorial independence and limiting the role of foreign state-backed entities in UK media.
Polling suggests strong public support for restrictions. Nearly 70% of voters oppose foreign government involvement in British media, with even higher levels of opposition among Conservative supporters.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative is recent, published on 2 July 2025. The amendment allowing foreign firms to own up to 15% of UK newspapers was passed in the House of Commons, aligning with recent legislative changes. The report cites a vote with a majority of 338 to 79, indicating a fresh development. However, similar discussions have been ongoing since 2023, with earlier reports highlighting debates over foreign ownership caps and concerns about foreign state influence. ([ft.com](https://www.ft.com/content/30e10b98-1958-449d-86b5-284a05c7c1dc?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The report includes direct quotes from Labour culture minister Stephanie Peacock and former Conservative leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith. Stephanie Peacock’s statement emphasizes the government’s aim to create certainty and sustainability for the newspaper industry while mitigating risks of foreign state influence. Sir Iain Duncan Smith’s comments express concerns about the potential impacts on media independence. These quotes are consistent with their known positions on media ownership and foreign influence, with no significant variations or discrepancies found. ([iainduncansmith.org.uk](https://www.iainduncansmith.org.uk/news/we-cant-let-foreign-state-take-over-telegraph?utm_source=openai))
Source reliability
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Independent, a reputable UK news outlet known for its investigative journalism. The report provides detailed information on the legislative changes and includes direct quotes from key political figures, enhancing its credibility. The Independent has a history of covering media ownership issues and political developments, indicating a strong track record in reporting on such topics.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative aligns with recent legislative changes allowing foreign firms to own up to 15% of UK newspapers. The inclusion of direct quotes from political figures adds credibility to the report. However, the report does not provide specific details on the vote count or the exact wording of the amendment, which would strengthen its plausibility. Additionally, while the report mentions concerns about foreign state influence, it does not delve into the specifics of these concerns or provide evidence supporting them.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is recent and aligns with recent legislative changes regarding foreign ownership of UK newspapers. It includes direct quotes from reputable political figures, enhancing its credibility. The source, The Independent, is a reputable UK news outlet known for its investigative journalism. While the report could benefit from more specific details on the legislative process and supporting evidence for the concerns raised, the overall assessment is positive.
