Pro-Palestine march in London sparks controversy over rising anti-Israel protests and security concerns

Supporters of Jeremy Corbyn’s Your Party are organising a large pro-Palestine march in central London amid fears that escalating anti-Israel protests threaten social cohesion and UK security, especially in the wake of recent terrorist attacks.

Supporters of Jeremy Corbyn’s left-wing movement, now called Your Party, are mobilising a large pro-Palestine march in central London on 11 October, marking two years since the Gaza conflict erupted. While some may claim this protest advocates for free expression, it is clear that it serves as a platform for the far-left to amplify their anti-Israel agenda under the guise of humanitarian concern. The timing, coinciding with recent vicious terrorist attacks—most notably the heinous synagogue assault in Manchester—exposes the true intent behind these demonstrations: a reckless push to politicise tragedy and weaponise grief against British values.

Your Party has called on supporters to march, framing it as a stand against “genocide in Gaza.” Yet, in reality, it’s a spectacle designed to dismiss Israel’s right to defend itself and to cast blame on Britain’s longstanding support for the Jewish state. Despite condemning terrorism in general, their leadership has deliberately avoided addressing the Hamas attacks that have precipitated this conflict, instead focusing on vilifying Israel and Western nations. This selective outrage reveals their agenda—placing pro-Palestinian activism above national security and communal harmony.

The government has rightly urged restraint, with Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood imploring protesters to respect the grief of Britain’s Jewish community. Yet, instead of defending the right to express support for Israel’s security, they have often failed to confront the radical elements flouting these warnings. Recent protests—some involving nearly 500 arrests, including supporters of militant groups—highlight the dangerous escalation of anti-Israel demonstrations. The government’s decision to bolster police powers aims to curb these disruptive protests, but it has sparked accusations from Your Party and far-left activists of trying to silence dissent and suppress free speech under the pretext of community safety.

Such protests, many perceiving them as outright hostility towards Britain’s Jewish community, are turning increasingly confrontational. The tragic Manchester attack—where a man of Syrian descent murdered two worshippers—has been exploited by the far-left to push a narrative of victimhood, extending blame onto society at large. This politicisation only fuels further tension and distracts from the real security priorities—namely, protecting British citizens from radicalisation and violence. Meanwhile, the police resource strain reveals an inability to effectively manage these competing demands.

Despite repeated calls to halt demonstrations out of respect for Jewish mourning, the pro-Palestine rallies have persisted—driven by cronies of far-left activists intent on stoking division. These protests undermine social cohesion, with some turning violent or confrontational, and authorities increasingly feeling the pressure to act against what many see as an emboldening of extremism. The government’s measures, including legislation allowing police to respond more swiftly to disruptive protests, are necessary steps to uphold national security.

This ongoing struggle to balance civil liberties with communal safety underscores a dangerous trend: left-wing activism that prioritises ideological solidarity with oppressive regimes over genuine British interests. It reflects a broader failure to adequately confront the threats posed by radicalism and a complacency that risks sacrificing our national security on the altar of political correctness. As the UK grapples with its identity amidst this turmoil, those committed to maintaining justice and security must stand firm against these divisive protests, recognising that true solidarity begins with safeguarding our communities and values.

Source: Noah Wire Services

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
8

Notes:
The narrative mentions a pro-Palestine march in London on 11 October, coinciding with the two-year anniversary of the Gaza conflict. This aligns with previous pro-Palestinian demonstrations in London, such as the one on 14 October 2023, which featured Jeremy Corbyn among the attendees. ([news.sky.com](https://news.sky.com/video/uk-jeremy-corbyn-among-those-attending-pro-palestinian-marches-12984554?utm_source=openai)) The report also references the formation of Jeremy Corbyn’s new political party, Your Party, announced on 24 July 2025. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/b89aba06138b952fef79c7612e15c866?utm_source=openai)) The timing of the planned rally and the formation of the new party suggests that the content is current and not recycled. However, the narrative’s focus on the Manchester synagogue attack and its connection to the pro-Palestinian march lacks direct corroboration in the provided sources, raising questions about its originality. Additionally, the report’s tone and language appear consistent with previous coverage of similar events, indicating a potential lack of freshness.

Quotes check

Score:
7

Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes attributed to Jeremy Corbyn and other figures. However, these quotes do not appear in the provided sources, suggesting they may be original or exclusive. The absence of these quotes in earlier material indicates a higher originality score, but the lack of corroboration raises concerns about their authenticity.

Source reliability

Score:
4

Notes:
The narrative originates from the Daily Mail, a publication known for sensationalist reporting. The lack of corroboration from other reputable outlets and the sensational tone of the report raise concerns about its reliability. The absence of direct quotes in the provided sources further diminishes the credibility of the report.

Plausability check

Score:
6

Notes:
The narrative’s claims about the pro-Palestinian march and its connection to the Manchester synagogue attack are plausible but lack direct corroboration. The report’s tone and language appear consistent with previous coverage of similar events, indicating a potential lack of originality. The absence of supporting details from other reputable outlets and the sensational tone of the report raise questions about its plausibility.

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM

Summary:
The narrative presents claims about a pro-Palestinian march in London on 11 October, coinciding with the two-year anniversary of the Gaza conflict, and its connection to the Manchester synagogue attack. However, the lack of corroboration from reputable sources, the sensational tone, and the absence of supporting details raise significant concerns about the report’s credibility and accuracy. The reliance on a single, sensationalist source further diminishes the reliability of the information presented.