Majority of head teachers oppose Ofsted’s new inspection report card amid calls for delay and legal challenge

Nearly nine in ten members of the NAHT support exploring industrial action over Ofsted’s controversial new school report cards, amid fears they could harm school leaders’ wellbeing and increase tensions within the education sector.

Nearly nine in ten members of the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) have expressed support for exploring industrial action in response to Ofsted’s proposed new school inspection system, the union announced following a highly attended online meeting. Almost 2,000 school leaders gathered to discuss Ofsted’s plans, with 89% agreeing that the union should consider strike options if the reforms proceed. NAHT general secretary Paul Whiteman described the plans as deeply unpopular within the profession and warned that enforcing them could jeopardise the health and wellbeing of school leaders and staff.

Ofsted confirmed it will implement the new report card system from November, despite overwhelming calls for a delay. The proposals introduce a five-point grading scale, renamed as ‘urgent improvement,’ ‘needs attention,’ ‘expected standard,’ ‘strong standard,’ and ‘exceptional,’ applied across multiple areas such as education quality, behaviour, personal development, and leadership. Ofsted’s aim is to offer clearer, more detailed information for parents and carers while providing constructive feedback for schools. Nevertheless, the NAHT and many school leaders remain unconvinced that this change will benefit schools or their communities.

Critics argue the return to grading risks perpetuating a high-stakes inspection regime that has previously been linked to serious negative outcomes, including increased stress and mental health problems among educators. NAHT president Angi Gibson highlighted the unrealistic expectation placed on inspectors to fairly evaluate schools across numerous categories during brief inspections, cautioning that such judgments could mislead parents and increase workload pressures for schools. An independent wellbeing assessment commissioned by Ofsted itself raised concerns over the impact of the new framework, yet the watchdog appears to have proceeded without addressing these warnings meaningfully.

This disquiet among educators is intensified by past tragedies linked to Ofsted inspections. In particular, the death of Ruth Perry, a headteacher at Caversham Primary School, who took her own life following a drastic downgrade of her school’s rating, remains a poignant reminder of inspection’s emotional toll. Professor Julia Walters, Ruth Perry’s sister, criticised Ofsted’s new system for continuing to expose school leaders to potential public shaming and urged the education secretary to halt the rollout.

Data from a snap poll by the NAHT—a survey receiving over 3,000 responses within 48 hours—showed more than 90% of school leaders reject the grading system, underscoring widespread opposition. While a YouGov poll suggested that about seven out of ten parents favour the new report cards over existing reports, stakeholders and experts, including the chief executive of the teacher wellbeing charity Education Support, have urged a pause or slowdown. They seek more careful consideration of the potential consequences for those operating within schools.

The NAHT has also taken legal steps by seeking a judicial review of Ofsted’s consultation process, arguing that proper engagement with the profession was lacking before the report card plans were finalised. Alongside legal action, the union continues to appeal to both Ofsted and the government to reconsider and pause the introduction of the new inspection framework in order to avoid exacerbating already high pressures on school leaders.

The government’s wider consultation on education inspection reforms aimed to provide parents and stakeholders with richer, clearer insights into school performance, expanding evaluation beyond singular ratings to cover a broader range of school functions. But the backlash highlights the tension between increased accountability measures and the practical, emotional realities faced by school communities.

As the November rollout approaches, the NAHT’s deliberations over industrial action and continuing calls for a rethink underline the deep unease within the education sector. The outcome will be closely watched by school leaders, educators, families, and policymakers navigating the balance between transparency, support, and the wellbeing of those working in England’s schools.

📌 Reference Map:

• Paragraph 1 – ^[1], ^[2]
• Paragraph 2 – ^[1], ^[6], ^[7]
• Paragraph 3 – ^[1], ^[4], ^[3], ^[5]
• Paragraph 4 – ^[1], ^[4], ^[3]
• Paragraph 5 – ^[1], ^[3]
• Paragraph 6 – ^[1], ^[3]
• Paragraph 7 – ^[1], ^[4]
• Paragraph 8 – ^[1], ^[7]
• Paragraph 9 – ^[1], ^[4], ^[7]

Source: Noah Wire Services

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
10

Notes:
The narrative is current, dated 18 September 2025, and reports on recent events, including the NAHT’s response to Ofsted’s proposed new inspection system set to commence in November 2025. ([irishnews.com](https://www.irishnews.com/news/uk/nearly-nine-in-10-heads-support-exploring-strike-options-over-ofsted-union-says-FOPSFP3BYVN2BCQAT5SAF2FO4M/?utm_source=openai))

Quotes check

Score:
10

Notes:
The direct quotes from NAHT General Secretary Paul Whiteman and President Angi Gibson are unique to this report, with no earlier matches found online, indicating original or exclusive content.

Source reliability

Score:
8

Notes:
The narrative originates from The Irish News, a reputable UK news outlet. However, cross-referencing with other reputable sources would further confirm the information’s accuracy.

Plausability check

Score:
9

Notes:
The claims align with known events, such as the NAHT’s previous legal action against Ofsted over inspection changes. ([bbc.co.uk](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clywql84xkxo?utm_source=openai)) The concerns about the impact of Ofsted’s new grading system on school leaders’ wellbeing are consistent with prior reports. ([tes.com](https://www.tes.com/magazine/news/general/naht-legal-action-against-ofsted-over-inspection-changes-report-cards?utm_source=openai))

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH

Summary:
The narrative is current and reports on recent events, with unique quotes indicating original content. The source is reputable, and the claims are consistent with known facts, suggesting a high level of credibility.