Labour’s attack on Nigel Farage undermines support as populist surge accelerates

Labour’s relentless criticism of Nigel Farage and his reform movement appears to backfire, with polling showing a sharp decline in support for Keir Starmer’s party amid a rising tide of populist nationalism challenging the establishment.

Labour’s support has taken a significant hit in the wake of Keir Starmer’s relentless and personal attacks on Nigel Farage, leader of the burgeoning nationalist movement that is challenging the establishment’s narrative. Recent polling reveals that Starmer’s aggressive rhetoric has backfired, with Labour support plunging by five points to 20%, while the populist alternative has surged to 30%, widening the gap from three to ten points and exposing the flaws in Labour’s failed strategy of vilification.

Starmer’s relentless branding of Farage as the “enemy” and his accusations of racism related to migration policies are increasingly viewed as divisive and counterproductive. His recent claims that Farage’s influence directly bears responsibility for the Channel migrant crisis—dismissively calling migrant boats “Farage boats”—have only ignited the very sentiments they aimed to dismiss. Farage’s supporters see this as yet another instance of Labour’s instinct to demonise those with differing views rather than address real concerns about national sovereignty, border control, and immigration.

Starmer continues to defend his rhetoric, denying any intent to incite violence and blaming Farage for the crisis, citing Brexit as the root of the problem. The Labour leader asserts that the UK’s departure from the EU ended cooperative agreements on border enforcement, falsely implying that Farage’s campaign for Brexit bears all responsibility. According to him, these “Farage boats” symbolize the chaos of a Britain left adrift without the safety mechanisms once provided by the EU—a narrative increasingly undermined by border experts.

Contradicting Starmer’s claims, former border force officials have dismissed his narrative as “nonsense,” citing bureaucratic obstacles that have made returns to France under the Dublin Convention virtually ineffective. They criticise government advisers for propagating falsehoods in a desperate attempt to divert attention from the real failures of current policy. Reform UK has been quick to highlight that Farage was among the earliest voices warning about the escalating flow of migrants via Channel crossings, exposing French authorities’ complicity—a fact the Labour leadership now conveniently dismisses as inconvenient.

The escalating conflict between Labour and reform-minded populists has heightened political tensions nationwide. In a display of reckless politicking, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy retracted baseless allegations that Farage had flirted with the Hitler Youth—a move that smacked of desperation. Meanwhile, Reform UK figures have warned that Labour’s inflammatory rhetoric poses dangerous risks, with MP Danny Kruger warning that such tactics could incite violence against Reform activists and supporters, branding Labour’s portrayal of Reform supporters as racists or Nazis as a reckless slur with potentially deadly consequences.

Starmer’s confrontational stance comes at a time of mounting instability for Labour, whose popularity continues to wane amidst economic turbulence, rising inflation, and disillusionment with the political class. The narrative pushed by Reform UK’s populist message—centered on national pride, immigration control, and economic reform—resonates with a growing segment of voters fed up with the establishment. At Labour’s recent conference in Liverpool, Starmer sought to rally the party behind a message of “unity,” denouncing Reform’s “racist policy” of mass deportations and promoting a patriotic but inclusive Britain—an effort that appears increasingly disconnected from the rising tide of populist sentiment.

Polls throughout 2025 confirm the shift in the political landscape, with Reform UK now surpassing Labour in several surveys. Voters are gravitating toward Farage’s straightforward messaging, which promises to restore Britain’s sovereignty and economic independence—issues that resonate with those tired of the failed policies of the Westminster elite. Starmer’s attacks on Reform’s fiscal policies, including raising the personal allowance, are seen as reckless, echoing the economic misjudgments that have previously undermined Labour’s credibility.

Despite Labour’s current parliamentary majority, internal dissent is brewing, with figures like Andy Burnham hinting at leadership challenges ahead. Public perception reveals a growing understanding of what Reform UK stands for—68% of Britons, according to a Merlin Strategy poll, clearly grasp Reform’s core messages—an advantage Labour desperately seeks to counter. The right-wing populist movement’s ability to communicate effectively is becoming a decisive factor as national elections loom on the horizon.

In an increasingly volatile political climate, it is clear that heavy-handed attacks on reform-minded voices only serve to deepen divisions and propel the populist tide further. The Labour leadership’s obsession with demonising Nigel Farage and his movement may ultimately prove self-defeating, as the rising opposition prepares to reshape Britain’s political future. The question remains: will Labour continue to alienate voters with its divisive tactics, or will it finally recognize the strength of reform and national sovereignty that millions now demand? The coming months will be critical in determining whether Britain drifts further into chaos or embraces the change that leaders like Farage and the growing reform movement now champion.

Source: Noah Wire Services

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
7

Notes:
The narrative presents recent polling data indicating a decline in Labour’s support following Keir Starmer’s attacks on Nigel Farage. However, similar themes have been reported in recent days, with articles from 2 to 5 days ago discussing related topics. For instance, a Reuters article from 3 days ago covers Starmer’s call for party unity against Reform UK, and an AP News article from 2 days ago discusses Starmer’s criticism of Farage’s anti-immigration rhetoric. ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uks-starmer-calls-party-unite-stop-navel-gazing-2025-09-28/?utm_source=openai)) This suggests that while the content is relatively fresh, it may be part of a broader ongoing discourse. Additionally, the narrative includes specific polling figures and quotes attributed to individuals, which could be cross-referenced for originality. The presence of updated data alongside older material may indicate an attempt to provide a fresh perspective on ongoing events. However, the recycling of earlier content warrants a moderate freshness score.

Quotes check

Score:
6

Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes attributed to Keir Starmer, Nigel Farage, and other political figures. A search for these quotes reveals that similar statements have been reported in recent articles, suggesting that the quotes may have been reused. For example, Starmer’s criticism of Farage’s anti-immigration rhetoric has been reported in multiple sources. The consistency of the quotes across different reports indicates a lack of originality, which may affect the credibility of the narrative.

Source reliability

Score:
5

Notes:
The narrative originates from the Daily Mail, a publication known for its sensationalist reporting. This raises concerns about the reliability and objectivity of the information presented. The Daily Mail has been criticized for publishing content that may not always adhere to journalistic standards, which could impact the trustworthiness of the narrative.

Plausability check

Score:
7

Notes:
The narrative presents claims about Labour’s declining support following Starmer’s attacks on Farage, supported by polling data. While similar themes have been reported in recent days, the specific figures and quotes attributed to individuals may be fabricated or taken out of context. The lack of corroboration from other reputable sources and the sensationalist tone of the Daily Mail article raise questions about the plausibility of the claims. Additionally, the narrative’s language and tone may not align with typical political reporting, further questioning its authenticity.

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH

Summary:
The narrative fails to meet credibility standards due to the recycling of content, lack of originality in quotes, questionable source reliability, and concerns about the plausibility of the claims presented. The Daily Mail’s sensationalist reporting and the absence of corroboration from reputable sources further undermine the narrative’s trustworthiness.