Bishop Arun Arora urges church to reclaim faith and symbols from far-right misuse

The Bishop of Kirkstall calls on Christians to oppose the desecration of faith and national symbols by far-right groups, as tensions escalate over invasive political use of Christianity in Britain.

The Right Rev Arun Arora, bishop of Kirkstall and co-lead on racial justice for the Church of England, has issued a powerful call for Christians to reclaim both their faith and the England flag from rightwing activists who, he warns, are desecrating these symbols in attempts to divide the nation. Delivered in a sermon at St James Church in Manston, Leeds, Arora’s message came shortly after a massive rightwing protest in London, where over 110,000 people marched, carrying crosses and displaying biblical verses. The demonstrators chanted religious slogans and called to defend “God, faith, family, homeland,” co-opting Christian imagery in a manner the bishop strongly condemned.

Arora urged Christians to reject neutrality in the face of what he described as “violence and injustice.” He called on them to confront “lips dripping with vituperation and hate,” refute division, and restore dignity in order to build the common good. Notably, he highlighted a “rising toxic tide of racism” across the country, with protests targeting asylum seeker accommodations and expressions of patriotism frequently disguised as faith but laced with intolerance. These sentiments, once considered shameful, have now found a public platform, accompanied by applause, according to Arora. He cited a recent assault on a Christian asylum seeker living in the Britannia hotel in Leeds, one of the locations targeted by rightwing activists.

The bishop’s uncompromising stance marks a notable intensification compared to earlier church responses to the London march. For instance, the Right Rev Anderson Jeremiah, bishop of Edmonton, had previously condemned the march for its links to division and racial intolerance, while bishops in Southwark emphasized their commitment to celebrating community diversity. The Right Rev Rose Hudson-Wilkin, bishop of Dover, acknowledged the right to peaceful protest but warned against protests becoming platforms for intolerance or aggression. Arora’s language, however, directly confronted the co-opting of Christian faith by far-right groups, aligning with broader concerns within the Church of England about the misuse of religious symbols in political agitation.

This concern is not isolated. Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has publicly condemned the use of Christian imagery by far-right rioters, calling it an offence to the faith and urging Christians not to associate with such groups, which he described as unchristian. Welby praised community leaders, including a Liverpool imam who reached out to rioters with offers of food and dialogue, exemplifying efforts at healing divisions through interfaith solidarity.

The Church of England itself faces significant internal challenges amid these external tensions. It is grappling with declining congregation numbers, internal divisions, and scandals that have raised questions about its future and ability to maintain a coherent message. At the same time, systemic issues such as institutional racism persist within the church, obstructing the progress of Black clergy and highlighting the need for deeper reforms. The appointment of bishops like Arora and Rosemarie Mallett to lead work on racial justice reflects a growing recognition within the church of these persistent inequalities.

Christianity in contemporary Britain is evolving, as diverse communities, including a growing number of Indian Christians from regions like Kerala and Tamil Nadu, enrich church life and contribute to its vibrancy. These communities not only bolster declining congregations but also embody the broader cultural and social plurality that the Church of England increasingly seeks to embrace amid its struggles.

Arora’s sermon thus underscores a critical moment for the church: a call to reclaim faith and national symbols from those who misuse them to sow division, and a challenge to affirm Christianity’s role in promoting justice, inclusion, and unity in a fractured society.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
10

Notes:
The narrative is fresh, with no prior publications found. The earliest known publication date is 18 September 2025. The report is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified. No similar content appeared more than 7 days earlier. The article includes updated data and original material, justifying a higher freshness score.

Quotes check

Score:
10

Notes:
No identical quotes were found in earlier material, indicating potentially original or exclusive content. No variations in quote wording were identified.

Source reliability

Score:
10

Notes:
The narrative originates from The Guardian, a reputable organisation, strengthening its reliability.

Plausability check

Score:
10

Notes:
The claims are plausible and align with recent events. The narrative is covered elsewhere, and supporting details from reputable outlets are present. The report includes specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, and dates. The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic. No excessive or off-topic detail unrelated to the claim is present. The tone is appropriately formal and resembles typical corporate or official language.

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH

Summary:
The narrative is fresh, original, and originates from a reputable source. All claims are plausible and supported by specific details. The language and tone are appropriate, with no signs of disinformation.